At Monday evening's meeting of the Loudon County Commission,
commissioners are set to vote on the county's long delayed budget. The most controversial item in
the budget is the amount of funds for the county school system.
The commission will decide on
whether to finance an additional $793,000 for the county schools proposed operating budget for
2009-2010 or to use that money to help finance the system's proposed building program. The
commission cannot line item the school budget. Commissioners are only able to give the school board
a bottom line figure and it will be up to the school board members to decide how to use the allotted
funds and what, if any, school programs or employees might have to be cut in order to balance their
budget.
Representatives of the school board at first told the county budget committee they
would be willing to spend approximately $400,000 from the system's reserve funds for textbooks for
the 2009-2010 year but the committee felt such a move would cut the school system's reserves to
dangerously low levels. Ultimately, the budget committee recommended the commission fund the nearly
$800,000 increase in the operating budget including the text book funds.
The school system's
total proposed budget is approximately $38 million and the school board is considering how, when or
if to begin Phase I of the school building program. Estimates on the amount of money needed to
complete the first phase of the plan range from $30 to $48 million.
Due to the struggling
economy and lower tax revenues, the school system has already had to cope with less money than
expected from the Basic Education Program (BEP) funds the county will receive from the state for
education.
At earlier meetings, commissioners have appeared divided on whether to prioritize
the operating budget or the school building program. Most commissioners seemed to feel the county
cannot afford to increase the operating budget and put away funds for the building program at the
same time.
Commissioner Don Miller has been the most vocal opponent of increasing this year's
school operating budget- a move he has said would cripple the school building program.
He has
presented handouts outlining how the county has increased property taxes by 40 cents over the last
four years. Out of the property tax, which 39 cents went to the system's operating budget and 15
cents to the building program. He has estimated this comes to about an 8.6 percent per year increase
in the operating budget over the last five years compared to 2.6 percent increase in inflation and
little student population growth. Miller disagreed with putting an additional $793,000 in the
operating budget this year and concluded that amount would support an additional loan of almost $10
million for the school building program.
Other commissioners disagreed with Miller's
conclusions. Commissioners Harold Duff and Nancy Marcus, both former educators, said they felt
employees and successful academic programs are a higher priority than the buildings themselves.
Commissioner Austin Shaver agreed more with Miller's assessment but he has told his fellow
commissioners it should not be an "either, or" situation. He did say he felt no program could be
successful if students are forced to hold classes in storage closets and trailers due to dilapidated
and overcrowded buildings.
Commissioners seem divided on whether or not to increase the
school system's budget for operating expenses. With the budget months overdue, the commission will
vote on the entire county budget Oct. 12. Monday evening's vote should allow the entire county
budget to be sent to the state for approval.
If the school system's proposed budget is
rejected by the commission, the school board will have to revamp the proposed school budget to find
places to cut the projected $793,000 overrun to fit whatever amount he commission
authorizes.
mary.hinds@news-herald.net